Our website use cookies to improve and personalize your experience and to display advertisements(if any). Our website may also include cookies from third parties like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Youtube. By using the website, you consent to the use of cookies. We have updated our Privacy Policy. Please click on the button to check our Privacy Policy.

Silk Dresses: Do We Need a Super Plus Size?

Fatty Model

When the category of the plus-size model was first introduced around 1980, to bring style to the clothes of bigger women, no doubt the models were bigger than average, but in the twenty-first century, with women having grown steadily bigger over the intervening years, plus size is now no more than average. The fashion industry has been reluctant to increase the size of plus-size models, so is it time to consider introducing a super plus size to bring elegance and style to a new generation of big beautiful women?

British Standard sizes for women’s clothes were introduced in 1982. At that time the average woman was still about size 12, so plus size models wearing size 14 and 16 dresses could serve the fashion needs of the majority of above-average-size women. However, by 2010, the proportion of size 12 women had fallen to 31 percent and nearly 40 percent of women were reported to be size 16 or above. So plus-size models of size 16 had come to represent the average woman, and large numbers of bigger women were again left without a category designation to inspire fashion designers to cater to their needs. Women’s vital statistics have changed, but the fashion industry holds onto the Twiggy era of the 1960s, and its gesture towards bigger women is still stalled in the 1980s.

[the_ad id=”3147″]

This drift has occurred in spite of some effort by fashion retailers to adjust to the changes in body size. In Britain, there is no legal requirement to adhere to the British Standards for women’s garments. Women who have not changed in body size over a number of years have noticed that their clothes have become looser to the extent that they have eventually moved down a size. This is because manufacturers have made each size a little larger: one UK high street retailer has raised its size 16 from 38-31.5-41 inches in 2003 to 39.5-33-43 inches today (2015). This hidden help may be appreciated by some bigger women but it still leaves a large proportion above the size of the standard plus size fashion model.

The British National Health Service (NHS) has warned about the prevalence of obesity among adults in England which rose from 15% to 25% between 1993 and 2013. The rate of increase has slowed since 2001 but the trend is still upwards. Women, as well as men, who are overweight or obese, are made aware of the dangers to their health and most are making efforts to reduce. However, whether they are struggling to regain a healthy BMI or stuck with an intractable problem, they deserve the opportunity to acquire fashionable clothes that enhance their natural beauty. If plus-size cannot be redefined upwards, this opportunity should be provided by introducing a new super plus-size category, perhaps with a special more flattering name.

Source by John Powell

By iBoldnBeauty


  • Aimee AMALA -

    I think its become more accessible in the highstreet in the UK. A lot more awareness has been made to different body types, I think its a great thing.

  • I live in the US and I am a size 18 which I consider plus size. I really don’t like it when a size 12-14 even 16 is considered plus size. I really wish they would eliminate the term plus size because it means different things to different people. I appreciate the history, I didn’t know it.

  • It would be nice for all manufacturers to make sure that their sizing is inclusive!

  • Emily Fata -

    I definitely think a more flattering name is needed. Or, better yet, just a continuation of sizes as opposed to totally categorizing it differently. After all, they’re ALL sizes, at the end of the day.

  • Dominique Walton Brooks -

    I knew some of this history but not all of it. I don’t know the best answer to this question. I think the industry will follow the populace and adjust its terms accordingly.

  • Sizing needs to be inclusive. It’s no good only catering to a certain category of body because in reality we’re all different and our bodies are all different. Some of us have big bums while some of us have big shoulders, it shouldn’t stop at an 18!

  • Stephanie S -

    Definitely and yes, hopefully with a more flattering name!

  • Anosa Malanga -

    I think size should not be an issue. People should not be acquainted by a person’s size.

  • You put forward such a important topic. i think more people needs to talk about it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Related Posts

  • Eyeshadow Makeup Tips Just For You

  • Beauty Therapy Vs Cosmetology

  • Acne Treatment Strategy That Is Right for You

  • Hemp Oil Benefits That People Ought To Know

error: Content is protected !!
%d bloggers like this: